Search for: All records

Research was conducted to observe the correlation of ignition delay, combustion delay, the negative temperature coefficient region (NTCR), and the low temperature heat release region (LTHR), in a constant volume combustion chamber (CVCC) in relation to blended amounts of iso-paraffinic kerosene (IPK) by mass with Jet-A and their derived cetane numbers (DCN). The study utilizes the ASTM standard D7668-14.a in a PAC CID 510 CVCC. The DCN was calculated using the ignition delay and combustion delay measured over 15 combustion events. The fuel blends investigated were 75%Jet-A blended with 25%IPK, 50%Jet-A with 50%IPK, 25%Jet-A with 75%IPK, neat Jet-A, and neat IPK. The ignition delay of neat Jet-A and IPK was found to be 3.26ms and 5.31ms, respectively, and the combustion delay of the fuels were 5.00ms and 17.17 ms, respectively. The ignition delay for 75Jet-A25IPK, 50Jet-A50IPK, 25Jet-A75IPK, fuel blends were found to be 3.5ms, 3.8ms, and 4.2ms, respectively. The combustion delay between the 75Jet-A25IPK, 50Jet-A50IPK, 25Jet-A75IPK, blends are 5.8ms, 7.0ms, and 9.4ms, respectively. The DCNs for 75Jet-A25IPK, 50Jet-A50IPK, 25Jet-A75IPK 43.1, 38.7, and 33.5, respectively. The DCN of the fuel blends compared to neat Jet-A was lower by 10.16% for 75Jet-A25IPK, 19.37% for 50Jet-A50IPK, 30.50% for 25Jet-A75IPK and 46.03% for neat IPK. Blends with larger amounts by mass of IPK resulted in extended ignition and combustion delays. It is concluded that the fuels that have larger amounts of IPK blended within them have extended NTC regions, LTHR regions, and decreased ringing intensity during combustion. 

fuel blend consisting of 10% S8 by mass (a Fischer-Tropsch synthetic kerosene), and 90% ULSD (Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel) was investigated for their combustion characteristics and impact on emissions during RCCI (Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition) combustion in a single cylinder experimental engine utilizing a 65% by mass n-butanol port fuel injection (PFI). RCCI is a dual fuel combustion strategy achieved with the introduction of a PFI fuel of the low-reactive n-butanol, and a direct injection (DI) of a high-reactivity blend (FT-BLEND) into an experimental diesel engine. The combustion analysis and emissions testing were conducted at 1500 RPM at an engine load of 5 bar IMEP (Indicated Mean Effective Pressure), and CA50 of 9° ATDC (After Top Dead Center); CDC (Conventional Diesel Combustion) and RCCI with 65Bu-35ULSD were utilized as the baseline for AHRR (Apparent Heat Release Rate), ringing and emissions comparisons. It was found during a preliminary investigation with a Constant Volume Combustion Chamber (CVCC) that the introduction of 10% by mass S8 into a mixture with 90% ULSD by mass only increased Derived Cetane Number (DCN) by 0.8, yet it was found to have a significant effect on the combustion characteristics of the fuel blend. This led to the change in injection timing necessary for maintaining 65Bu-35F-T BLEND RCCI at a CA50 of 5° ATDC (After Top Dead Center) to be shifted 3° closer to TDC, thus affecting the Ringing Intensity (RI), Pressure Rise Rate, and heat release of the blend all to decrease. CDC was conducted with a primary injection of 14ᵒ BTDC at a rail pressure of 800 bar, all RCCI testing was conducted with 65% PFI of n-butanol by mass and 35% DI, to prevent knock, with a rail pressure of 600 bar and a pilot injection of 60° BTDC for 0.35 ms. 65Bu-35ULSD RCCI was conducted with a primary injection at 6° BTDC with neat ULSD#2, the fuel 65Bu-35F-T BLEND in RCCI had a primary injection at 3° BTDC to maintain CA50 at 9° ATDC. 65Bu-35ULSD RCCI experienced a NOX and soot emissions decrease of 40.8% and 91.44% respectively in comparison to CDC. The fuel 65Bu-35F-T BLEND in RCCI exhibited an additional decrease of NOX and soot of 32.9 and 5.3%, in comparison to 65Bu-35ULSD RCCI for an overall decrease in emissions of 73.7% and 96.71% respectively. Ringing Intensity followed a similar trend with reductions in RI for 65Bu-35ULSD RCCI decreasing only by 6.2% whereas 65Bu-35F-T BLEND had a decrease in RI of 76.6%. Although emissions for both RCCI fuels experienced a decrease in NOX and soot in comparison to CDC, UHC and CO did increase as a result of RCCI. CO emissions for 65Bu-35ULSD RCCI and 65Bu-35F-T BLEND where increased from CDC by a factor of 5 and 4 respectively with UHC emissions rising from CDC by a factor of 3.4. The fuel 65Bu-35F-T BLEND had a higher combustion efficiency than 65Bu-35ULSD in RCCI at 91.2% due to lower CO emissions of the blend.